Multifactorial diabetes insipidus during pregnancy: a challenging diagnosis
- Alexandra Novais Araújo 1,
- Maria Cunha 2,
- Tiago Marques 2 and
- Maria João Guerreiro Martins Bugalho 1 , 3
- 1 Hospital de Santa Maria, Serviço de Endocrinologia, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte EPE, Lisboa, Portugal
- 2 Hospital de Santa Maria, Serviço de Infecciologia, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte EPE, Lisboa, Portugal
- 3 Faculdade de Medicina Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- Correspondence to Professor Maria João Guerreiro Martins Bugalho; maria.bugalho@chln.min-saude.pt
Abstract
Diabetes insipidus (DI) is characterised by thirst and polydipsia with hypotonic polyuria. Several forms exist, namely, central or pituitary, nephrogenic and gestational and must be differentiated for adequate treatment. We describe the case of a 41-year-old woman chronically infected with HIV who had been recently medicated with a tenofovir-based antiretroviral treatment and who, at 22 weeks of pregnancy, presented with transient gestational DI. Obstetric ultrasound revealed oligohydramnios and foetal growth restriction that did not improve despite serum sodium correction. The severity of the case suggested the presence of an underlying disorder and elevated copeptin levels indicated that an underlying subclinical form of nephrogenic DI, possibly induced by HIV-related nephropathy or tenofovir use, was present and rendered clinically overt during pregnancy.
Background
Diabetes insipidus (DI) is a syndrome characterised by the excretion of abnormally large volumes of dilute urine, frequently associated with increased thirst and polydipsia. Aetiological causes vary; however, they can be divided into four categories, including central (or pituitary) DI, caused by inadequate production and secretion of antidiuretic hormone (arginine-vasopressin, henceforth referred to as AVP), nephrogenic DI caused by renal insensitivity to the antidiuretic effect of AVP, gestational DI caused by increased placental degradation of AVP and primary polydipsia, caused by suppression of AVP secretion by excessive fluid intake,1 sometimes classified as a separate entity.
DI during pregnancy is a rare condition, estimated to affect 4 in every 100 000 pregnancies.2 During pregnancy, particularly in the second and third trimesters, placental trophoblast produces increased levels of vasopressinase, resulting in increased degradation and clearance of AVP.3 Although this is usually a physiological process, it may result in overt disease, especially in patients with predisposing conditions, and may lead to complications such as dehydration and oligohydramnios. A diagnosis of gestational DI warrants an investigation into the underlying cause, which may reveal a pre-existing subclinical DI (central or nephrogenic). Some pregnancy-related factors that may induce gestational diabetes include abnormally high levels of vasopressinase in women with large placental volumes or altered liver function, which may occur in pre-eclampsia, HELLP syndrome or acute fatty liver disease of pregnancy.4
Published associations between an underlying subclinical nephrogenic DI and transient gestational DI are much rarer in literature and may be underdiagnosed.
Case presentation
A 41-year-old woman with HIV infection as well as chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection presented to an appointment with an Infectious Diseases specialist in January 2020. She had a history of irregular adherence to antiretroviral therapy and had been diagnosed with AIDS in 2009, with a previous hospitalisation due to presumed cytomegalovirus (CMV) encephalitis and Kaposi sarcoma in 2014. She denied alcohol intake, smoking and illicit drug use. She had undergone a full-term pregnancy in 2006 with no complications. Family history was irrelevant.
Six months earlier, she had agreed to restart antiretroviral therapy and had been prescribed tenofovir 245 mg/day, emtricitabine 200 mg/day and dolutegravir 50 mg/day, with good viral control and no reported side effects or relevant laboratory alterations but had missed follow-up consultations after 3 months. On her return, the patient revealed that she had abandoned treatment since the previous month and was currently pregnant (estimated 22 weeks of pregnancy time). She denied taking any medications. Moreover, she reported general malaise since the past 3 weeks. Physical examination revealed blood pressure of 87/61 mm Hg, heart rate of 61 bpm, peripheral saturation of 96% and no fever. Skin turgor was decreased. Discourse was poor and disorganised. Neurological examination revealed ataxia and dysmetria in the finger–nose test. The patient was led to the emergency department for immediate evaluation.
Investigations
Laboratory tests revealed slight anaemia (haemoglobin 101 g/L), de novo renal dysfunction (creatinine 118 µmol/L, blood urea nitrogen 19 mmol/L, with a normal glomerular filtration rate 3 months earlier) with hyperosmolar (osmolality 322 mOsmol/kg) hypernatraemia (serum sodium 161 mmol/L), normokalaemia (potassium 4.4 mmol/L), normoglycemia (glucose 4.6 mmol/L) and normocalcemia (calcium 1.26 mmol/L). Liver parameters such as transaminase, bilirubin and gamma glutamyl transferase levels were within normal range; C reactive protein was 261 nmol/L, with no leucocytosis. Urine specific gravity was 1.013. Kidneys appeared globose but otherwise unremarkable on renal ultrasound.
The patient was then admitted to the Department of Infectious Diseases for further investigation. A 24-hour urine test revealed low urinary osmolality of 216 mOsmol/kg. A hormonal panel demonstrated normal values of thyroid-stimulating hormone (1.82 IU/L, free thyroxine 11 pmol/L), adrenocorticotropic hormone (12.7 ng/L) and serum cortisol (502 nmol/L). Copeptin levels were elevated (22.68 pmol/L), in consistency with the elevated serum osmolality.
HIV immunovirological evaluation revealed a viral load of 2 300 000 copies/mL and a CD4 lymphocyte population of 426 cells/uL. HBV viral load was 86 IU/mL and no CMV DNA was detected.
Obstetric ultrasound demonstrated a near-absence of amniotic fluid and a fetus at the ninth percentile with considerable signs of pulmonary hypoplasia.
Cerebral MRI was performed on the 15th day of admission and, despite revealing large confluent areas of white matter hypersignal in periventricular, subcortical and just-cortical areas, predominantly in the frontotemporal region and cerebellum, they were perceived to be overall less extensive when compared with previous examinations from 2004. No pituitary lesions or alterations were recorded.
Cerebrospinal fluid tap was traumatic, with no detectable CMV or human polyomavirus 2 (JC virus) DNA.
Differential diagnosis
A diagnosis of DI must be considered in any patient with hyperosmolar hypernatraemia and low urine osmolality. Establishing its aetiology is essential for optimal treatment and management; in this case, transient gestational DI was the most likely diagnosis considering the chronological association between pregnancy and disease onset. However, the severity of symptoms and degree of foetal underdevelopment mandated an investigation into other possible contributing factors including a previously undiagnosed subclinical form of central or nephrogenic DI.
Central DI is considered to be the most common form in nonpregnant patients; presentations may differ depending on the degree of deficiency of AVP synthesis.5 Although this patient had a history of central nervous system disorder, we could find no evidence of current neurologic opportunistic infection, pituitary injury or space-occupying lesions, which are frequently associated with central DI6; moreover, elevated levels of copeptin, a surrogate marker for AVP concentration, indicated adequate vasopressin production,7 rendering a diagnosis of central DI unlikely.
Consequently, nephrogenic DI caused by antidiuretic hormone resistance seemed more plausible in this context. Associated causes include congenital mutations in aquaporine or AVP genes as well as acquired disorders, mostly secondary to chronic renal injury or medication-induced tubulopathy.8 In this case, adult-age onset of DI seemed to favour the latter hypothesis.
Considering then acquired nephrogenic DI to be the main underlying contributor to the present syndrome, the source of renal dysfunction leading to AVP resistance remained to be established. Although this patient had a normal glomerular filtration rate up until 3 months prior to hospital admission, she had been living with HIV for more than 10 years, a known risk factor for acute and chronic renal disease; additionally, globose kidney appearance on ultrasound supported the possibility of tubulointerstitial HIV-associated nephropathy.9 Tubular dysfunctions have been implicated in the genesis of nephrogenic DI,5 however, we could find no publications linking HIV-associated nephropathy and DI. Drug-induced DI also seemed plausible and a review of literature placed the antiretroviral tenofovir as a likely causative agent.10 11
Treatment
On admittance, volume and sodium were slowly corrected with hypotonic saline solution. Considering the diagnosis of gestational DI, it was decided to attempt a trial of oral desmopressin (0.06 mg/day). Renal function returned to baseline levels on the third day after admission. Due to persistent hypernatraemia, in an attempt to surpass the effects of increased vasopressinase, it was decided to increase desmopressin dosage to 0.06 mg two times per day, which was followed by clinical and biochemical improvements (serum sodium levels 142 mmol/L and serum osmolality 282 mOsmol/kg 1 day later).
Regarding HIV, highly active antiretroviral therapy with tenofovir 245 mg/day, emtricitabine 200 mg/day and dolutegravir 50 mg/day was reintroduced after normalisation of renal function, with no adverse effects.
After correction of hypernatraemia, the patient displayed a marked improvement of psychomotor abilities over the following week, until complete recovery was attained. Nevertheless, amniotic fluid status remained unchanged and foetal condition continued to deteriorate until pregnancy was deemed inviable and was terminated, with the mother’s consent, at 24 weeks.
Desmopressin was discontinued 3 days after termination of pregnancy. On revaluation 5 months after clinical discharge, although sodium concentration remained normal, copeptin levels were still found to be elevated (20.70 pmol/L).
Discussion
This represents an unusually severe case of transient gestational DI, which required an investigation into other contributing factors. Although no clear breakpoints have been established during pregnancy, copeptin levels higher than 20 pmol/L suggested the presence of an underlying nephrogenic DI. As for its specific aetiology, despite the lack of published examples, we speculate that HIV-associated nephropathy may have contributed to a subclinical form of DI, which had hitherto gone unnoticed. Another possible culprit is tenofovir, whose link to nephrogenic DI has been well documented.10 In this case, however, the association is unclear due to the difficulty in establishing a chronological connection between symptom onset and tenofovir administration, since the patient denied taking any medications in the previous month and neither symptoms nor hypernatraemia recurred after tenofovir reinstatement.
Regarding treatment, although nephrogenic DI is characterised by resistance to AVP and does not respond to desmopressin, gestational DI implies excessive vasopressinase activity due to increased production by the placental trophoblast and most cases respond to low doses of desmopressin, as this synthetic AVP analogue is capable of resisting degradation by vasopressinase.4 For this reason, we decided to administer desmopressin until the pregnancy was terminated.
As for complications, transient DI during pregnancy is not generally associated with significant maternal or foetal morbidity and mortality. Nonetheless, associations with pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, particularly HELLP syndrome, have been described. These syndromes lead to alterations in hepatic functions that may decrease the hepatic degradation of placental vasopressinase, consequently exacerbating gestational DI.3 In this case, it is questionable whether chronic HBV infection may have contributed to the development of DI in the absence of overt liver disease. A possible, although rare complication of DI is oligohydramnios, usually associated with prolonged hypernatraemia, and most cases are reversed on serum sodium and volume correction.12–14 In this case, however, judging by the timing and severity of symptoms as well as the degree of amniotic fluid deficiency and impact on foetal development, DI seems to have developed early in the pregnancy. In addition, these alterations did not resolve on treatment of DI, a rare occurrence. The possibility of a primary placental disease resulting in overexpression of vasopressinase was considered, however, pathology revealed adequate placental weight and structure, in accordance with gestational age.
In the future, revaluating copeptin levels after switching to an antiretroviral regimen without tenofovir might provide the definitive clue as to the source of subclinical DI in this patient; presently, however, both the patient and her attending physician were reluctant to alter a treatment that was proving efficacious in viral and immunological control, in the absence of overt DI.
Learning points
-
Diabetes insipidus (DI) is a syndrome characterised by polyuria and polydipsia, with typical laboratory findings of hyperosmolar hypernatraemia and a dilute urine.
-
Specific subtype of DI must be established for optimal treatment; categories include central or pituitary DI, in which there is inadequate production of antidiuretic hormone arginine-vasopressin (AVP), nephrogenic DI caused by renal insensitivity to AVP, gestational DI, caused by increased degradation of AVP and primary polydipsia, sometimes categorised as a separate entity.
-
Gestational DI is a rare condition that may result in maternal dehydration and oligohydramnios, with negative consequences to foetal development. Transient gestational DI may be unmasked by an underlying subclinical form of central or nephrogenic DI. Care must be taken to exclude hepatic complications that predispose to this condition.
-
Differentiating between subtypes of DI can be challenging. Although the indirect water restriction test has been the gold standard for decades, more recent methods, such measurement of copeptin, a surrogate marker for AVP concentration, have simplified the distinction between nephrogenic and non-nephrogenic DI.
-
Patients living with HIV may bear an increased risk for development of DI, which may result from opportunistic infections, antiretroviral medication or chronic kidney disease.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr Ana Raquel Gomes, endocrinologyst specialist, for the patient clinical orientation and scientific support. We would like to thank Dr Alexandra Zagalo e Melo, infectious disease specialist, who follows the patient since several years.
Footnotes
-
Contributors ANA and MC contributed equally to this paper. They were responsible for discussing, planning and conduct the article. Both of the authors equally write the manuscript. TM: discuss and analysis of data. MJGMB: conception, analysis and interpretation of data.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Patient consent for publication Obtained.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer